In November last year, the U.S. Department of Education (USED) issued final regulations for Accountability and State Plans. Those regulations clarified that ESSA State Plan submission dates were being extended, and therefore, the dates for identifying schools for Comprehensive and Targeted Support and Improvement (the new labels for “school improvement”) were also being extended. Identification of schools for improvement under ESSA now won’t happen until the 2018-2019 school year.
In December 2016, USED held meetings for SEA federal program administrators and USED staff indicated at the beginning of their accountability session that they are working on a response to the two biggest questions State Education Agencies (SEAs) and Local Education Agencies (LEAs or school districts) had as a result of the extensions:
- Will there be schools identified for improvement during the 2017-2018 school year (a requirement of ESSA for which funding is earmarked)?
- What happens to the funding set aside by SEAs to award grants to support these low-performing schools identified for improvement under ESSA?
In a January 13, 2017 email from Ann Whalen, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Education, information was provided to help guide SEAs and LEAs through the issues surrounding these two questions.
For issues related to identifying schools for improvement the letter indicated that:
- States that obtained ESEA flexibility may either: (1) continue to serve their existing priority and focus schools; or (2) refresh their list of focus and priority schools using the same methodology that was in place prior to the start of the 2017-2018 school year.
- States that did not obtain ESEA flexibility must continue to support and intervene in schools or LEAs that were identified in the 2016-2017 school year by the State as in need of improvement, corrective action, or restructuring
- One big change from the 2016-2017 transition guidance on this topic is that an SEA may remove from its list, any school (or LEA) that has met State-determined criteria to no longer be identified as a focus or priority school under ESEA flexibility, or no longer be identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring.
This last point is something that was asked for in the previous year, but was not granted. Due to the delay in implementation of accountability under ESSA, from 2017-2018 to 2018-2019, the USED was more agreeable to allowing schools (or LEAs) to be removed from these lists
Another looming question related to the fact that SEAs are required to set aside funds to support low-performing schools identified for improvement. School improvement funds must be used to fund school improvement activities in schools identified under ESSA for Comprehensive and Targeted Support and Improvement starting in the 2017-2018 school year. Since potentially no schools will be identified for Comprehensive or Targeted Support and Improvement in 2017-2018, clarification was needed concerning how to administer these funds.
The solution provided in the letter from Ann Whalen is that funds set aside to support low-performing schools identified for improvement must be used to support the schools that are identified for improvement based on the answer to the first question. So, during the 2017-2018 school year, those schools and LEAs that continue in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring (non-flexibility waiver states) as well as those schools that either continue in or are identified as focus and priority schools will be eligible to receive these funds. The letter also notes that these funds can be carried over into the 2018-2019 school year and used to fund schools identified for Comprehensive or Targeted Support and Improvement during that school year.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact us at 425.977.2100, Option 3 or email at email@example.com.